- Jahrgang 22 (2015)
- Vol. 22 (2015)
- >
- Ausgabe 1
- Nr. 1
- >
- Seiten 139 - 155
- pp. 139 - 155
Is There a Common Cypriot Subjunctive?
Seiten 139 - 155
DOI https://doi.org/10.13173/medilangrevi.22.2015.0139
1 Adamović, M. 1985. Konjugationsgeschichte der türkischen Sprache. Leiden.
2 Agouraki, G. 1991. A Modern Greek complementizer and its significance for Universal Grammar. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 1–24.
3 Aksu-Koç, A. 2006. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge.
4 Demir, N. 2002. “Wollen” im Zyperntürkischen. Mediterranean Language Review 14: 9–20.
5 Ercilasun, A. B. 1995. Türkçede Emir ve İstek Kipi Üzerinde. In: Türk Gramerinin Sorunları Toplantısı, 22–23 Ekim 1993. Ankara: 61–66.
6 Ergin, M. 2000. Türk Dil Bilgisi. İstanbul.
7 Gencan, T. N. 1975. Dilbilgisi. Ankara.
8 Giannakidou, A. 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua 119: 1883–1908.
9 Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. 2005. Turkish – A Comprehensive Grammar. London.
10 Grohmann, K., Panagiotidis, Ph. & Tsiplakou, S. 2006. Some properties of wh-question formation in Cypriot Greek. In: Janse, M., Joseph, B. & Ralli, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Patras: 83–98.
11 Gulle, V. O. 2011. Structural borrowings in Cypriot Turkish from Cypriot Greek. Mediterranean Language Review 18: 91–113.
12 Holton, D., Mackridge, P. & Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1997. Greek: a Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London-New York.
13 Johanson, L. 1992. Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten. Stuttgart.
14 Kaili, H., Çeltek, A., Georgalidou, M. 2012. Complement Clauses in the Turkish variety spoken by Greek-Turkish bilingual children on Rhodes, Greece. Turkic Languages 16: 106–120.
15 Kappler, M. 2008. Contact-induced effects in the syntax of Cypriot Turkish. Turkic Languages 12/2: 203–220.
16 Kornfilt, J. 1997. Turkish. London-New York.
17 Lewis, G. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford.
18 Menz, A. 1999. Gagausische Syntax. Eine Studie zum kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandel. (Turcologica. 41.) Wiesbaden.
19 Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1994. The subjunctive mood and the syntactic status of the particle na in Modern Greek. Folia Linguistica 28: 297–328.
20 Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1998. Functional categories and Modern Greek syntax. The Linguistic Review 15: 159–186.
21 Philippaki-Warburton, I. & Spyropoulos, V. 2004. A change of mood: The development of the Greek mood system. Linguistics 42: 791–817.
22 Rivero, M.-L. & Terzi, A. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 310–332.
23 Roussou, A. 2000. On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65–94.
24 Tietze, A. 1962. Erlebte Rede im Türkischen. Oriens 15: 337–344.
25 Tsoulas, G. 1993. Remarks on the structure and interpretation of na-clauses. Studies in Greek Linguistics 14: 191–206.