Skip to content

Regular Irregularities: What Does the OCP Do and Not Do to the Verbal System of Modern Hebrew?

Pages 83 - 103


Bar-Ilan University

1 Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer; F. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In: M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretatio. The Hague-Berlin: 187–212.

2 Anderson, S. R. 1981. Where is morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.

3 Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge.

4 Anttila, A. 2006. Variation and opacity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24/4: 893–944.

5 Arad, M. 2005. Roots and patterns – Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Doedrecht.

6 Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge.

7 Aronoff, M. 1994a. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge.

8 Aronoff, M. 1994b. Blocking. In: Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 1. Oxford: 373–374.

9 Aronoff, M. 2007. In the beginning was the word. Language 83: 803–830.

10 Bat-El, O. 1989. Phonology and Word Structure in Modern Hebrew. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

11 Bat-El, O. 2002. Semitic verb structure within a universal perspective. In: J. Shimron (ed.), Languages Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-based, Morphology. Amsterdam: 29–59.

12 Bat-El, O. 2011. Semitic templates. In: M. van Oostendrop, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden: 2586–2608.

13 Ben-Asher, M. 1972. The verb patterns: a matter for grammar or the lexicon. Hauniversita 17: 31–34.

14 Benua, L. 1997. Transderivational Identity: Phonological Relations Between Words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

15 Berent, I. & Shimron, J. 1997. The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the Obligatory Contour Principle. Cognition 64: 39–72.

16 Berkley, D. 1994. The OCP and gradient data. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24/1–2: 59–72.

17 Berman, R. A. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel-Aviv.

18 Berman, R. A. 1993. Marking of verb transitivity by Hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 20: 641–669.

19 Berman, R. A. 2003. Children's lexical innovations: developmental perspectives on Modern Hebrew verb-structure. In: J. Shimron (ed.), Language Processing and Language Acquisition in a Root-based Morphology. Amsterdam: 243–291.

20 Bermúdez-Otero, R. 1999. Constraint interaction in language change: quantity in English and Germanic [Opacity and globality in phonological change]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester & Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

21 Bohas, G. 1990. A Diachronic Effect of the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 21/2: 298–301.

22 Bolozky, S. 1978. Word formation strategies in Hebrew verb system: denominative Verbs. Afroasiatic Linguistics 5: 1–26.

23 Bolozky, S. 1982. Strategies of Modern Hebrew verb formation. Hebrew Annual Review 6: 69–79.

24 Bolozky, S. 1999. Measuring productivity in word formation: the case of Israeli Hebrew. Leiden.

25 Bolozky, S. 2003. The ‘roots’ of denominative Hebrew verbs. In: J. Shimron (ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology. (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders Series. 28.) Amsterdam: 131–146.

26 Booij, G. E. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In: G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: 1–16.

27 Booij, G. E. 2005. An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford.

28 Borer, H. 1991. The causative-inchoative alternation: a case study in Parallel Morphology. The Linguistic Review 8: 119–158.

29 Borochovsky Bar-Aba, E. 2001. The Verb – Structure, Meaning and Use: A Study in Contemporary Hebrew. Beer-Sheba. [In Hebrew.]

30 Bresnan, J. 2001. Explaining morphosyntactic competition. In: M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: 1–44.

31 Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam.

32 Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In: A. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in Transformational Grammar. Waltham: 184–221.

33 Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the syllable. Cambridge.

34 Coetzee, A. & Pater, J. 2008. Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 84: 289–337.

35 Cohn, A. & McCarthy, J. 1994/1998. Alignment and parallelism in Indonesian phonology. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 12: 53–137.

36 Doron, E. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11: 1–67.

37 Embick D. 2007. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 1–37.

38 Embick D. & Marantz, A. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53.

39 Ephratt, M. 1997. The psycholinguistic status of the root in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 41/1–2: 77–103.

40 Everett, D. & Berent, I. 1998. The comparative optimality of Hebrew roots: an experimental approach to violable identity constraints. Ms., University of Pittsburgh and Florida Atlantic University.

41 Frisch, S. A. 2004. Language processing and the OCP effects. In: B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology. Cambridge: 346–371.

42 Frisch, S. A. & Zawaydeh, B. 2001. The psychological reality of OCP-Place in Arabic. Language 77: 91–106.

43 Giegerich, H. J. 2001. Synonymy blocking and the elsewhere condition: lexical morphology and the speaker. Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 65–98.

44 Goldenberg, G. 1998. Studies in Semitic Linguistics. Jerusalem.

45 Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

46 Goldsmith, J. 1993. Harmonic Phonology. In: J. Goldsmith (ed.), The last phonological rule. Chicago-London: 21–60.

47 Greenberg, J. 1950. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 5: 162–181.

48 Hale, M., Kissock, M. & Reiss, C. 1998. Output-output correspondence in OT Phonology. In: E. Curtis, J. Lyle & G. Webster (eds.), The Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 16. Stanford: 223–236.

49 Harley, H. 2010. A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: 426–447.

50 Haspelmath, M. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In: B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity. (Studies in Language Companion Series. 23.) Amsterdam: 87–120.

51 Horvath, J. 1981. On the status of vowel patterns in Modern Hebrew: Morphological rules and lexical representations. In: T. Thomas-Finders (ed.), Extended Word-and-paradigm Theory. (UCLA Working Papers.) Los Angeles: 228–261.

52 Horvath, J. & Siloni, T. 2008. Active lexicon: adjectival and verbal passives. In: S. Armon-Lotem, G. Danon & S. Rothstein (eds.), Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: 105–134.

53 Itô, J. & Mester. A. 2002. On the sources of opacity in OT: coda processes in German. In: C. Féry & R. van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: 271–303.

54 Kenstowicz, M. 1995. Cyclic vs. non-cyclic constraint evaluation. Phonology 12: 397–436.

55 Kiparsky, P. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In: I. S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul.

56 Kiparsky, P. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17: 351–367.

57 Kiparsky, P. 2005. Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 113–135.

58 Koontz-Garboden, A. & Levin, B. 2005. The morphological typology of change of state event encoding. In: G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi & S. Scalise (eds.), Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Università degli Studi di Bologna. Bologna: 185–194.

59 Laks, L. 2009. How to choose a prosodic template: On verb innovation and variation in Hebrew. In: E. Fuss & C. Trips (eds.), Morphological Blocking and Linguistic Variation: A Typological Perspective. (Language Typology and Universals. 62, 4.) Berlin: 307–324.

60 Laks, L. 2010. One verb, two Binyanim (templates): On morphological variation in the Hebrew verbal system. In: R. Ben-Shahar, G. Toury & N. Ben-Ari (eds.), Hebrew – A Living Language V. Tel-Aviv: 293–312. [In Hebrew.]

61 Laks, L. 2013. Why and how do Hebrew verbs change their form? A morpho-thematic account. Morphology 23/3: 351–383.

62 Laks, L. (In press.) Verb innovation in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic: The interaction of morpho-phonological and thematic-semantic criteria. Brill's Annual Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics.

63 Leben, W. 1973. Suprasegmentalphonology. Doctoral dissertation, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

64 Levin, B. & Rappaport-Hovav, M. 1994. A Preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua 92: 35–77.

65 McCarthy, J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–263.

66 McCarthy, J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 43: 84–108.

67 McCarthy, J. 1989. Linear order and phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 71–100.

68 McCarthy, J. 1994/1998. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In: P. A. Keating (ed.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology III. Cambridge: 191–283.

69 McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. 1993. Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. (Report no. RuCCS-TR-3.) New Brunswick. (Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive #482,

70 Mester, A. 1986. Studies in Tier Structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

71 Mifsud, M. 1995. Loan Verbs in Maltese: A Descriptive and Comparative Study. Leiden.

72 Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht.

73 Moreshet, M. 1976: Hif'il with no difference from Qal in the language of Hazal. Bar-Ilan 13: 249–281. [In Hebrew.]

74 Ornan, U. 1971. Verbal-patterns, stems: inflections and derivations. Ha-Universita 16: 15–22. [In Hebrew.]

75 Ornan, U. 2003. The Final Word. Haifa. [In Hebrew.]

76 Padgett, J. 1995. Structure in Feature Geometry. Stanford, CA.

77 Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. (Technical Report CU-CS-696-93 and Technical Report TR-2.) Boulder-New Brunswick-Amherst.

78 Rappaport-Hovav, M. & Levin, B. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In: M. Everaert, M. Marelj & T. Siloni (eds.), The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface. Oxford: 150–176.

79 Ravid, D. 2004. Later lexical development in Hebrew: derivational morphology revisited. In: R. A. Berman (ed.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence: Psycholinguistic and Crosslinguistic Perspectives. (Trends in Language Acquisition Research series.) Amsterdam. 53–82.

80 Ravid, D. 2008. Parsimony and efficacy: The dual binyan system of Hebrew. Paper presented at the 13th International Morphology Meeting 2008, Vienna.

81 Reinhart, T. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.

82 Reinhart, T. [to appear]. The theta system: Unaccusative and experiencer derivation. (ed. by Tal Siloni). The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

83 Reinhart, T. & Siloni, T. 2005. The Lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 3.

84 Rose, S. 2000. Rethinking geminates: long-distance geminates and the OCP. Linguistics Inquiry 31: 85–122.

85 Rosén, H. 1977. Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague.

86 Scalise, S. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht.

87 Schwarzwald, O. R. 1981. Grammar and Reality in the Hebrew Verb. Ramat Gan. [In Hebrew.]

88 Schwarzwald, O. R. 1996. Syllable Structure, alternations and verb complexity: The Modern MH verb patterns reexamined. Israel Oriental Studies 16: 99–112.

89 Schwarzwald, O. R. 2002. Hebrew Morphology. 12 Study Units. Tel Aviv. [In Hebrew.]

90 Schwarzwald, O. R. 2008. The special status of Nif'al in Hebrew. In: S. Armon-Lotem, S. Rothstein & G. Danon (eds.), Generative Approaches to Modern Hebrew Linguistics. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: 61–75.

91 Schwarzwald, O. R. 2009. Three related analyses in Modern Hebrew morphology. In: G. Goldenberg & A. Shisha-Halevy (eds.), Egyptian, Semitic and General Grammar. (Studies in memory of H. J. Polotsky.) Jerusalem: 277–301.

92 Siloni, T. 2002. Active lexicon. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383–400.

93 Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Cambridge.

94 Steriade, D. 1982. Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification. Doctoral dissertation, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

95 Ussishkin, A. 1999. The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew denominal verbs and output-output correspondence. Phonology 16: 401–442.

96 Ussishkin, A. 2005. A fixed prosodic theory of nonconcatenative templatic morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 169–218.

97 Williams, E. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114.

98 Wunderlich, D. 1997. Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.

99 Yip, M. 1988. The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 65–100.

100 Yip, M. 1989. Feature geometry and co-occurrence restrictions. Phonology 6: 349–374.


Export Citation